Just for the hell of it, I decided to follow up on my idle threat to delve deeper into the comments to see what I could find.
Here are a few graphs, deduce from them whatever you want.
The total number of comments was 183, left by 37 readers.
Comments plotted
9 Responses to “Comments plotted”
Have your say - submit a comment
THE SMALL(ish) PRINT... (updated 23/07/2016)
By submitting a comment to this blog you grant me permission to reproduce its content and to reproduce the submitted name/URL in attribution. I will leave your content in its intended place and in its unedited form unless one or more of the following apply:
If you ask me to modify, move or delete your content, I’ll consider making the requested change(s) so long as there’s no significant alteration of the context of the content or of any debate associated with it;
If you change your email address or URL, I’ll update these details in older comments so that I'm not displaying dead links;
If I decide to change the theme or layout of this blog, thus affecting the placement and/or visibility of comments, I’ll make whatever changes I see fit for the smooth running of this blog;
If any comment contains insulting profanity or other content which I deem to be causing or likely to cause trouble, I’ll edit or delete as I see fit for the smooth running of this blog. I’ll try to remember to display the reason(s) for whatever editing I do, so that folk aren’t left hanging wondering what happened and why. If you can at least try to "disguise" your swearing, it would be much appreciated.
Other things to consider:
Comments must contain at least 3 characters;
You can use some code in comments, feel free to give it a shot and see what works;
If adding pics, the recommended maximum dimension is 600px.;
Comments containing many links will be held for moderation;
I reserve the right to amend this policy in line with proven applicable current legislation;
Free Speech: you may well have the right to it, but you've no right to compel me to a) listen to it, or b) publish it!
I deduce that Scott is gobby.
[quote comment="415"]I deduce that Scott is gobby. :mrgreen:[/quote]
I suspect that these stats merely support what was already a widely-known fact, MJ. 😉
It's about time he got his own site/blog up and running, I reckon.
When might one expect to receive one's commemorative medal?
😀
One might expect one's medal at any time, Scott. However, just like Christmas gifts, what one expects and what one gets are often quite different. 😐
As a late starter, it nice to see I've moved past some of the mid-field in the talking about stuff race.
blimey i beat both Aktoman and WD in being gobby for a change, assuming the John was indeed this John
😆
Your assumption is correct, there's only one "Prolific John". 🙂
I've always said that Scott speaks far too much. But, he has dugs that I get to play with so I'll retract my statement and say "He's a jolly nice chap, and you should be proud to have him comment (everywhere) on your Blog!" 😆
Alright BG? Hope life's treating you well, mate 😉
LOL, BigDug!
Life's just bumping and grinding along as per usual. Plenty to do, plenty to moan about, not enough hill-time (but I'm becoming inured to that). I trust that you're fine and ready for the festive season?