So, did you vote?

Posted by @ 6:20 pm on Friday 16th November, 2012.

Yeah, I'm on about yesterday's PCC elections.

I'm not usually apathetic about using my democratic rights, but none of the candidates here seemed to want to put any effort into garnering any support. We've had no canvassers, no leaflets, no posters in the streets.

Democracy in action?

More like Democracy inaction.

Would I want our local Constabulary to be run by somebody who couldn't even be arsed to tell us his/her name, let alone what he/she stands for?

No.

I didn't vote because I couldn't make an informed decision.

And now they're wondering why the turnout was so poor.

It doesn't take a lot of brain-power to work it out.

5 Responses to “So, did you vote?”

  1. Well said....my opinion too and many others I feel.

  2. Steve Brown says:

    There were 8 boxes on my ballot paper, so I ticked all of them.
    Just to be sure, of course.

  3. BG! says:

    Here you go, I've just found out who I could have voted for:

    Suleman Nagdi, Sarah Russell and Sir Clive Loader

    I've never seen or heard of any of them before, and if the winner is as publicly-visible as our current MP, I doubt that I'll ever see or hear about him/her ever again!

    The result was as follows:

    "Sir Clive Loader has been elected as the first ever Leicestershire and Rutland police and crime commisioner. The Conservative candidate won with 64,661 votes, compared to Labour candidate Sarah Russell's 51,835, after second preference votes had been taken into account. The average turnout across Leicestershire and Rutland was 16%."
    Source

  4. alan.sloman says:

    Like you, Stef, the only information I had through the letter box was my voting card.
    I have absolutely no idea who the candidates were, so no-one got my vote.

  5. BG! says:

    @Steve Brown - LOL, that'll make up for the lack of votes in Bettws, Newport :mrgreen:

Have your say - submit a comment

THE SMALL(ish) PRINT... (updated 23/07/2016)

By submitting a comment to this blog you grant me permission to reproduce its content and to reproduce the submitted name/URL in attribution. I will leave your content in its intended place and in its unedited form unless one or more of the following apply:

If you ask me to modify, move or delete your content, I’ll consider making the requested change(s) so long as there’s no significant alteration of the context of the content or of any debate associated with it;
If you change your email address or URL, I’ll update these details in older comments so that I'm not displaying dead links;
If I decide to change the theme or layout of this blog, thus affecting the placement and/or visibility of comments, I’ll make whatever changes I see fit for the smooth running of this blog;
If any comment contains insulting profanity or other content which I deem to be causing or likely to cause trouble, I’ll edit or delete as I see fit for the smooth running of this blog. I’ll try to remember to display the reason(s) for whatever editing I do, so that folk aren’t left hanging wondering what happened and why. If you can at least try to "disguise" your swearing, it would be much appreciated.

Other things to consider:

Comments must contain at least 3 characters;
You can use some code in comments, feel free to give it a shot and see what works;
If adding pics, the recommended maximum dimension is 600px.;
Comments containing many links will be held for moderation;
I reserve the right to amend this policy in line with proven applicable current legislation;
Free Speech: you may well have the right to it, but you've no right to compel me to a) listen to it, or b) publish it!