I'm no musician but I like to think that I know class when I hear it:
😕
FWIW, it sounds much better when all three vids are running together.
Archive for the 'Rambling on…' Category
They can’t both be telling the truth
More Prometheus stuff...
Do you remember the following?
Fox studio chief TOM ROTHMAN: "This I can tell you and I can tell all the fans, not one frame will be cut. The movie will be what it should be. We will not cut a frame of the film," he promised. "We will stand behind it 100 percent and if that means it's an R, then so be it, because not an ounce, not a percentage are we going to compromise the film."
Well, now director RIDLEY SCOTT is talking about an extended version...
SCOTT: This is fundamentally the director’s cut. But there will be half an hour of stuff on the menu because people are so into films - how they’re made, how they’re set up, and the rejections in it. That’s why it’s fascinating. So this will all go on to the menu.
Well I’m curious about the deleted scenes. Specifically in this film, Noomi Rapace mentioned maybe there was a fight scene... [I've omitted the next bit as it's a spoiler]
SCOTT: The [spoiler] fight scene was pretty good. It will definitely go on the menu. It won’t go on the long version... [I've omitted the next bit as it's a spoiler]
You’re going to do an extended cut on the Blu-ray/DVD. Is it a lot longer?
SCOTT: Twenty minutes.
Of course, they could both be telling porkies.
There's a fair few in-movie and promo references to the epic Lawrence of Arabia movie, maybe Rothman and Scott should give thought to Mr. Dryden's words:
"A man who tells lies, like me, merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten where he put it."
Mangez-vous franglais?
This is fusion-food and fusion-lessons gone too far:
I mean, just how "authentic" will it be with Cheddar in it?
I seem to recall that the French have some minging cheeses of their own, so why bastardize the thing?
All this makes no difference to Anna - just like me, she doesn't like cheese of any persuasion.
And yes, "Cheddar" is a proper noun and hence needs a "C".
Education, eh?
Weyland-JPL… Building Better Wheels
There's an interesting/nerdy story about the design-evolution of the wheels on NASA's Curiosity Rover. The tale goes something like this...
An early suspension-test prototype rover was equipped with metal wheels which prominently featured "JPL" in raised letters which would imprint the company's initials onto the surface of Mars:
According to one of the scientists on the project, NASA was extremely upset by the "JPL" raised letters on the wheels, wanting them to read "NASA" instead. JPL assured NASA that this was merely a prototype and that the letters wouldn't appear on the final model.
Eventually the design was finalised and approved, and the wheels were made and fitted:
I'd imagine that the NASA folks would have felt that they'd won a little victory over JPL - all of the lettering on the wheels had been designed-out.
And I'd imagine that JPL's lot would have felt far more victorious because they'd got their initials in there anyway in the form of Morse Code which NASA, apparently, didn't notice:
🙂
Well, they launched Curiosity back in November 2011 and it's scheduled to land on Mars in August 2012 so there's no chance that they'll call it into the pits for a tyre-change. JPL will leave its mark on Mars despite NASA's objection. And those marks will be useful - the regular Morse patterns in the wheel-tracks will act as index marks, Curiosity's camera will count them to judge the distance travelled across the surface.
I reckon that's a cool story.
Of course you don't want to read too much into these things or you might start to believe that this pattern:
bears some similarity to this logo:
Building Better Wheels Worlds
😉
New Card, Security Alert
Right on schedule last week my debit card fell apart. The chip fell out of it. The same thing happened two years back and two years before that, IIRC. It's a design flaw, it's bound to happen eventually when a rigid chip is embedded in a flexible card. I've discussed the matter with my account managers a few times and all that they ever recommend is that I try avoid bending the card. That's difficult when it resides in a wallet which stays as much as possible in the back pocket of my trews - it's inevitable that it'll be flexed twixt butt and seat when I sit down anywhere. The irony is that I have a Flex Account...
Anyway, I'd phoned for a replacement card last week and it arrived this morning. I did all the right things - I signed the reverse side of the new card, I destroyed the old card, I broke the old chip, I updated all of my online accounts. It was only when I came to tear up the three-section folded accompanying letter that I noticed something odd... something worrying...
- The upper section which had been between the card and the envelope bore a "carbon-copy" of the front of my card - the embossed characters had pressed the paper against the blue-printed inside of the envelope and the result was a clear-as-day blue-on-white "brass-rubbing" image of my card details.
- The middle section had been pressed directly against the card-front and so the card's embossed details were indented into the paper. Again, apart from being reversed, the details were clearly legible.
- The best bit was the lower section where the back of the card had been - the indents of the three-digit security code (and the last four digits of the long card number) are light indents filled with black pigment, and that pigment clearly wasn't dry when the letter and card were married together - there on the paper was a reversed yet clear black-on-white contact-print of my security code.
In short, all of the details needed to go shopping on the phone were there for anybody to read. Indeed, along with my name and address as printed on the letter, and a quick online search to find my D.O.B., there are sufficient details there to get through the phone-banking security checks and do some serious account-hacking.
Now I know that we're advised to take care when disposing of sensitive documents but when compiled properly these accompanying letters should bear no account details apart from the recipient's name and address, and the address of the issuing bank or building society, so the letters should be perfectly safe. Based on that assumption, some folk might just scrunch up their letters and dispose of them. And if they haven't noticed that the traces of their card details are there for others to see, and if that letter goes whole into the paper-recycling bin, and if some cheap-labour eco-migrant paper-sorter finds it down at the recycling centre, then it's phone-shopping party-time for somebody and financial hell for the card-holder.
I've told the phone-banking peeps about it and I've been into branch to show them the letter, they've never seen such a situation before and they're quite concerned about the security implications. They say that they''ll "take measures..." I should point out that this isn't the fault of the bank or building society, it's a problem at the agency that they contract to make and package the debit cards.
So please be advised: next time you get a new card, be careful about how you dispose of the leftovers. We give eco-migrants far too much already without giving them free and easy access to our personal savings.
Poetry Bucks
I guess that a lot of folk have received, or are due to receive soon, a similar letter...
"Dear Parent/Guardian,
Recently [your child's name]'s school, [your child's school] submitted some of their pupil's work for our [title here] competition...
Work has been selected for publication based on perception, imagination, expression, interpretation of poetry and use of language...
I am therefore delighted to inform you that [your child's name]'s poem, [poem title], has been chosen for publication in [title of publication]...
Each school featured in the book will receive a complimentary copy for their library, and a copy of the book will be sent to the British Library and further libraries across the UK and Republic of Ireland...
... to mark [your child's name]'s achievement we've enclosed a certificate of merit and a bookmark...
Also enclosed is a Copyright/Permission form for [your child's name]'s poem...
Books in this series will be attractively laid out A5 softbacks with a full colour cover...
Yourself, and family members, are entitled to order before publication at £15.99 per copy, and for every two copies you purchase we'll give you a third copy free..."
Leaving aside the obvious grammatical errors in the letter, the rest sounds good. My daughter's work in print, with both her name and her school's name there on the page. In truth her poem is really good, her Head Teacher is really impressed by it and I'm really proud of her. And she's in there with a chance of a reward for her efforts, but more about that later.
My daughter's obviously good at poetry, let's see how good I am at ball-park maths...
The publisher has received entries from "UK and overseas" and the books are regional collections - for example, the one offered to us covers works from pupils in Leicestershire and Northamptonshire Secondary Schools. The competition is open to all pupils aged 11-18, the latest available data from the ONS is for the year 2008/9 and shows that there were approximately 4 million eligible pupils in the U.K. (source, it's in .xls format).
Now I'll do some estimating...
Looking at the U.K. pupil stats I'll deduct 10% to account for those pupils that don't continue with English post-16. I'll deduct another 20% which is a complete guess at the number represented by schools that don't participate, and another 10% for qualifying pupils that didn't submit an entry. That still leaves 2.4 million potential entrants.
Now I'll split the maths into two parallel calculations. Why? Well, if you believe the blurb, all submissions are filtered, so the number of "Well Done" letters sent out to proud parents would be relatively low. I'll call that "Scenario 1". However, if you believe some of the accounts available on the internet (see here and here) some schools submit all of their pupils' output and these "Well Done" letters then get delivered to all of the parents of pupils concerned. I'll call that "Scenario 2". For both Scenarios I'll assume that of all the parents that receive "well done" letters 1/3 will buy one book, 1/3 will buy two and get a third book free, and the remaining 1/3 won't buy anything.
I'll also round up the book price to £16.00 to make the maths easy.
So, Scenario 1...
After filtering, the best 10% of pupil's poetry pieces (the best three pieces from each class of 30 pupils sounds like a reasonable estimate) are submitted and are proposed for publication. That would mean 240,000 "Well Done" letters and 240,000 potential sales. Assuming the 1:1:1 uptake ratio, that's sales of 80,000 @ £16 and 80,000 @ £32, I make that £3,840,000
And Scenario 2...
With no filtering, all of the poetry pieces are proposed for publication. That would mean 2,400,000 "Well Done" letters and 2,400,000 potential sales. Assuming the 1:1:1 uptake ratio, that's sales of 800,000 @ £16 and 800,000 @ £32, I make that £38,400,000
You'll have noticed that I've only done the calculations based on U.K. pupil numbers. I shudder to think of the results possible if the "overseas" element was to be included. Oh, and there's P&P to be added - £2 per order for deliveries in the U.K., £4.95 per book for deliveries anywhere else.
Now fair enough, everybody's out to make a buck these days, and I know that there are printing, distribution and other costs to be deducted from those figures before a true profit figure can be calculated, but we're still talking huge sums of money here for a publisher that has all of the content provided by kids, via schools, for free.
Talking of the kids and the schools, what do they get out of all of this, aside from getting their poetry and their names in print?
Well, the generosity of the publisher knows no bounds...
"We will be awarding £3,000 in cash prizes to 7 schools nationwide, with the best school winning £1,000. The best young writer in each regional collection will be awarded a £10 book token."
A £10 book token for each best regional writer?
Considering the amount of money in this venture, that's not a prize, that's an insult.
Did somebody at the back just mention "exploitation"?
