Most of today's news is fairly grim, but here's a reason to be cheerful:
Story here.
Of course, that was the easy bit.
A real challenge would be to convince the BBC's dimwitted web writers/editors to use the acronym "NASA", not "Nasa".
Note to Auntie: It's not as if there are no clues on the web. You could even crib it from the NASA logo:
THE SMALL(ish) PRINT... (updated 23/07/2016)
By submitting a comment to this blog you grant me permission to reproduce its content and to reproduce the submitted name/URL in attribution. I will leave your content in its intended place and in its unedited form unless one or more of the following apply:
If you ask me to modify, move or delete your content, I’ll consider making the requested change(s) so long as there’s no significant alteration of the context of the content or of any debate associated with it;
If you change your email address or URL, I’ll update these details in older comments so that I'm not displaying dead links;
If I decide to change the theme or layout of this blog, thus affecting the placement and/or visibility of comments, I’ll make whatever changes I see fit for the smooth running of this blog;
If any comment contains insulting profanity or other content which I deem to be causing or likely to cause trouble, I’ll edit or delete as I see fit for the smooth running of this blog. I’ll try to remember to display the reason(s) for whatever editing I do, so that folk aren’t left hanging wondering what happened and why. If you can at least try to "disguise" your swearing, it would be much appreciated.
Other things to consider:
Comments must contain at least 3 characters;
You can use some code in comments, feel free to give it a shot and see what works;
If adding pics, the recommended maximum dimension is 600px.;
Comments containing many links will be held for moderation;
I reserve the right to amend this policy in line with proven applicable current legislation;
Free Speech: you may well have the right to it, but you've no right to compel me to a) listen to it, or b) publish it!
it's the Bbc, Stef...
🙄
I'll set 'em up, you knock 'em down, Alan
But therein lies the oddness - they seem to do OK with initialisms such as BBC, IRA and LA, but they struggle with acronyms such as NASA, FIFA and IRIS. There are some cracking combination cock-ups to be had, such as http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scie.....t-25322732 where you get not only Nasa and Iris but also inconsistent capitalisation of "Sun".
Of course, it's entirely possible that their language-manglers don't know that there are differences between initialisms and acronyms, but it's more likely that they just don't care.